Jo And Professor Bhaer Age Gap

TL;DR: The age gap between Jo March and Professor Bhaer is approximately 15 to 20 years. In Little Women, Jo is in her late teens to early twenties, while Professor Bhaer is portrayed as a middle-aged man, likely in his late thirties or early forties.

Jo And Professor Bhaer Age Difference Infographic

So About That “Funny Match” Alcott Made…

The internet exploded when Greta Gerwig’s 2019 Little Women basically said “what if Jo didn’t actually marry the older German dude?” But here’s the tea: Louisa May Alcott was trolling her readers way back in 1869, and we’re still not over it.

When Jo March gets engaged at 25 to Professor Bhaer (who’s somewhere between 38-45), she’s choosing intellectual partnership over hottie neighbor Laurie. The exact age gap? Approximately 16 years, which eerily mirrors Alcott’s real-life age difference with family friend Henry David Thoreau.

Plot twist incoming: This wasn’t even what Alcott wanted for her literary alter ego…

Why Did Alcott Give Jo a Middle-Aged German Professor?

Pure spite, honestly. Alcott originally intended Jo to remain a “literary spinster” (her words), but her publisher and legions of young female fans demanded to know “who the little women marry.”

So what does our queen do? She writes in her journal: “I won’t marry Jo to Laurie to please anyone.” Instead, she creates Friedrich Bhaer—deliberately “not handsome,” with “rusty” clothes and large hands. As she told a friend, “out of perversity” she “went & made a funny match for her.”

🔍 Age-Gap Intel: The 16-year gap wasn’t typical for first marriages in 19th-century America, where most couples were 2-4 years apart. But it was a HUGE literary trope—the “May-December” romance usually involved wealthy older men and young beauties.

Here’s where Alcott gets subversive: Bhaer is poor AF. He offers Jo zero material advantage. She literally rejects rich Laurie because she “couldn’t bear a rich husband.”

The Great Bhaer vs. Laurie Debate (Team Edward vs. Team Jacob Could Never)

For 150+ years, readers have been fighting about whether Jo should’ve ended up with her childhood bestie or the professor. Let’s break down the receipts:

Team Laurie’s Evidence:

• Childhood companions with “witty banter”
• Passionate quarrels that scream sexual tension
• Jo’s rejection feels like narrative betrayal

Team Bhaer’s Case:

• Marmee explicitly says Jo and Laurie would be miserable together
• Jo consistently calls Laurie “my boy” (friend zone level: expert)
• Bhaer challenges Jo intellectually, not just emotionally

The real kicker? In the book, Bhaer gently critiques sensationalist writing (not knowing Jo writes it), inspiring her to abandon “trash” for authentic work. Modern adaptations turn this into a full argument because apparently we need our heroines ANGRY, not thoughtfully evolving.

Speaking of adaptations, let’s talk about Hollywood’s Bhaer problem…

A Century of De-Aging the Professor (Because Hollywood Gonna Hollywood)

Every film adaptation plays the same game: cast someone younger and hotter than the “not handsome” middle-aged professor Alcott described. The evidence:

• 1933: Paul Lukas (39) directed so paternally that critics called the romance “downright wrong”
• 1949: Rossano Brazzi (30) cast specifically to be young and hot
• 1994: Gabriel Byrne (44) actually age-appropriate but given “vulnerability”
• 2017 BBC: Mark Stanley (30) significantly closes the gap
• 2019: Louis Garrel (36) and they made him French because why not?

💡 Fun Fact: The 2019 version literally shows Jo writing the romantic ending for her publisher while the “real” Jo stays single and successful—Greta Gerwig said “I’ll give you BOTH endings and make you think about it.”

But wait, there’s a deeper story about who inspired the Professor…

The Real Men Behind Professor Bhaer (It’s Not Who You Think)

Professor Bhaer wasn’t based on one person but several men in Alcott’s life:

• Henry David Thoreau: 16-year age gap with Louisa (HELLO, exact same as Jo and Bhaer)
• Ralph Waldo Emerson: Alcott’s girlhood crush and lifelong mentor
• John Suhre: German-American soldier Alcott nursed during the Civil War, described as having “a heart as warm & tender as a woman’s”

The German nationality matters too. For 19th-century New Englanders, Germany = philosophy and profound thought. When Jo discovers Bhaer’s distinguished Berlin professor past, it adds “a spice of romance” beyond his humble tutor present.

📊 By The Numbers: Compared to other literary age gaps of the era (Jane Eyre’s 20 years, Middlemarch’s 26), Jo and Bhaer’s 16 years was actually moderate.

So What’s the Real Tea on Jo and Bhaer?

Here at Age-Gap Files, we see Alcott’s “funny match” as accidentally progressive. Jo rejects:

• The wealthy hottie (Laurie)
• Traditional marriage benefits
• Social expectations

She chooses:

• Intellectual partnership
• Shared values over shared age
• A collaborative life project (Plumfield school)

Timeline receipts show their relationship develops over 2+ years with major life events (Beth’s death, Jo’s artistic evolution) creating emotional readiness. This isn’t instalove with a father figure—it’s a slow-burn meeting of minds.

The million-dollar question: Did Alcott accidentally write the only marriage her independent heroine could thrive in?

Your Turn: Team Bhaer or Team Laurie?

After 150+ years, we’re still debating whether Jo made the right choice. Was Alcott’s “perverse” match actually genius, or should Jo have chosen her age-appropriate bestie? And more importantly—which film Bhaer is the most acceptable de-aging?

Keep the conversation going in our comments—your literary age-gap takes are always welcome.

Curious about your own age compatibility? Try our Age Difference Calculator for instant insights.

FAQ