Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Age Gap

TL;DR: The age gap between Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick is 4 years. Kourtney was born on April 18, 1979, and Scott was born on May 26, 1983. This age difference became a topic of public interest during their on-again, off-again relationship, which began in the early 2000s.

Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Age Difference Infographic

Wait, Only 4 Years? Why Did It Feel Like 40?

Here’s the thing about Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick’s relationship: mathematically, their age difference was basically nothing. Born April 18, 1979, and May 26, 1983, respectively, they had exactly 4 years, 1 month, and 8 days between them. But watching Keeping Up With the Kardashians, you’d think Kourtney was dating her teenage son’s best friend.

The couple met in 2006 at Joe Francis’s Mexican villa (yes, the Girls Gone Wild guy—already a red flag buffet). Kourtney was 27, Scott was 23, and her first impression? He was “annoying,” “four years younger,” and jobless. Not exactly the meet-cute dreams are made of.

🔍 Age-Gap Intel: Before becoming “Lord Disick,” Scott was actually a book cover model for the Heartland young adult novel series. Talk about a glow-up gone sideways.

But here’s where the timeline gets juicy…

How Did 4 Years Become Reality TV’s Biggest Maturity Gap?

When KUWTK premiered in 2007, the producers struck narrative gold. Sure, George and Amal Clooney have 17 years between them, but nobody’s making that their entire personality. For Kourtney and Scott? Those 4 years became the foundation for every. single. plotline.

The show created perfect archetypes: Kourtney as the exhausted mom-figure (even before actual motherhood), and Scott as the perpetual man-child who thought shoving $100 bills in waiters’ mouths was peak comedy. Remember when he punched a mirror in Vegas? Or when he told postpartum Kourtney his “dream weight” for her was 93 pounds? The man was a walking cautionary tale.

📊 By The Numbers: Between 2007-2015, Scott’s televised transgressions included multiple rehab stints, documented infidelity scandals, and approximately 847 scenes of Kourtney issuing ultimatums.

Ready for the plot twist nobody talks about?

When Did Their Ages at Major Milestones Tell the Real Story?

The receipts paint a fascinating picture. When Mason was born in 2009, Kourtney was 30—prime “I’ve got my life together” age. Scott? He was 26, still figuring out which end was up. By the time Reign arrived in 2014, she was 35 and he was 31, but emotionally? The gap had only widened.

Timeline evidence shows the pattern:

• 2006 (ages 27/23): Met in Mexico, she thinks he’s immature
• 2009 (ages 30/26): First baby, first major “grow up” ultimatum
• 2013 (ages 34/30): Scott loses both parents, spirals harder
• 2015 (ages 36/32): Final breakup after Monte Carlo cheating photos

The kicker? When Scott tried to propose in 2011, Kourtney basically said “thanks but no thanks.” She’d watched her parents’ marriage implode and wasn’t about to legally bind herself to someone she couldn’t trust to adult properly.

Speaking of post-breakup patterns, this is where it gets REALLY interesting…

Why Did Scott Flip the Script After Kourtney?

After spending nine years as the younger, messier partner, Scott pulled a complete 180. His next serious relationship? Sofia Richie, who was 19 to his 34. Then came Amelia Hamlin—also 19 when he was 37. Suddenly, Lord Disick wasn’t the baby anymore.

The Post-Kourtney Dating Math:

• With Kourtney: -4 years (she was older)
• With Sofia: +15 years (he was older)
• With Amelia: +18 years (he was older)

The man went from being babied to… well, dating actual babies (legally speaking, of course). Psychology experts would have a field day with this reversal—after years of being positioned as the immature one, he exclusively pursued relationships where he held all the power cards.

But how does their gap compare to other Hollywood couples?

Where Does Kourt and Scott’s Gap Rank in Celebrity Land?

The Age-Gap Files research shows their 4-year difference is practically microscopic compared to Hollywood standards. Dennis Quaid and Laura Savoie? 39 years. Sarah Paulson and Holland Taylor? 31 years. Even relatively “normal” couples like Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds have 11 years between them.

But here’s the key difference: those couples don’t make their age gaps their entire brand. Nobody’s watching George Clooney get scolded by Amal for acting like a frat boy. The Kardashian-Disick dynamic proved that storytelling matters more than mathematics.

💡 Fun Fact: Their age gap was smaller than the age range of the Friends cast when that show premiered. Yet somehow, it defined everything.

Now for the million-dollar question…

What Can We Actually Learn from Their Age-Gap Drama?

The Kourtney-Scott saga teaches us that age gaps aren’t just about numbers—they’re about life stages, emotional maturity, and whether you’re both rowing in the same direction. Four years means nothing if you’re both 35 and 39 with careers and kids. But 23 and 27 when one person’s partying in Vegas while the other’s planning a family? That’s a canyon, not a gap.

Their relationship survived three kids, two parent deaths, and approximately 4,000 filmed arguments. It was a trauma bond performed for public consumption, where every reconciliation and breakup became both deeply personal and weirdly commercial. The age gap gave producers an easy narrative hook, but the real story was about two people who loved each other but could never quite sync up their life clocks.

The ultimate irony? Now that they’re co-parents in their 40s, those 4 years probably feel like nothing. Time has a funny way of shrinking gaps that once felt insurmountable.

What’s your take—was their age gap the real problem, or just the convenient excuse for deeper incompatibilities?

Curious about your own age compatibility? Try our Age Difference Calculator for instant insights.

FAQ