Prince Charles And Camilla Age Gap

TL;DR: Prince Charles and Camilla have an age gap of 1 year and 4 months. Prince Charles was born on November 14, 1948, and Camilla was born on July 17, 1947. Despite the small difference, their long-standing relationship has remained a focal point in royal history.

Prince Charles And Camilla Age Difference Infographic

Wait, She's Older Than Him?

Plot twist: the woman who waited 35 years to marry her prince is actually the older one in this relationship. Queen Camilla, born July 17, 1947, has got a whole year and change on King Charles, who arrived November 14, 1948. That's 485 days of extra life experience that clearly came in handy when navigating what might be history's messiest love triangle.

The age gap math here is basically a rounding error—we're talking about two people born during the same presidential administration. Yet somehow their relationship managed to rock the British monarchy harder than any May-December romance ever could.

Timeline receipts show this was never about birthdays...

Why Did Everyone Lose Their Minds Over 16 Months?

Here's where the story gets properly bonkers: while Hollywood couples are out here with 20-year gaps getting zero side-eye, Charles and Camilla's practically twin-like ages somehow became part of royal controversy bingo. The real scandal? Camilla had the audacity to... not be a virgin in the 1970s.

According to the archival report, when they first connected in 1971 (Charles: 22, Camilla: 23), the Palace literally deemed her "unsuitable" because she'd dated other people. Meanwhile, Andrew Parker Bowles was bouncing between Camilla and Princess Anne like some kind of aristocratic ping-pong ball, and nobody blinked.

The actual barriers to their relationship read like a medieval checklist: wrong bloodline ranking, previous romantic experience, and later—the cardinal sin—being divorced. Age never even made the list.

Speaking of that first marriage...

The Parker Bowles Years: A Love Quadrangle for the History Books

Camilla married Andrew Parker Bowles on July 4, 1973, while Charles was deployed with the Royal Navy. Fun fact: Andrew had been dating Princess Anne right when Charles and Camilla started their thing. This wasn't a love triangle—it was a full social quadrangle with everyone apparently cool about it except the British public.

The marriage produced two kids (Tom in '74, Laura in '78), with Charles serving as Tom's godfather because aristocrats gonna aristocrat. Meanwhile, Andrew reportedly "quite enjoyed the fact that his wife was sleeping with the future King"—actual words from biographers, not making this up.

By 1986, with Diana firmly established as the People's Princess, Charles and Camilla were back on. The timeline shows they maintained their affair while both were married, creating what the press dubbed the "War of the Waleses."

But the real bombshell was still coming...

"Tampongate" Changed Everything (Yes, Really)

December 17, 1989: the night a radio enthusiast with a scanner changed royal history forever. The six-minute phone call between Charles and Camilla included him saying he wanted to be reincarnated as her tampon. THE FUTURE KING. SAID THIS. ON A PHONE.

When the transcript hit Australian tabloids in January 1993 (because even British tabloids had limits), 68% of the public thought Charles had tarnished his reputation. Princess Diana reportedly called it "sick" while also claiming "Game, set and match"—which, honestly, iconic.

The scandal wasn't about their 16-month age difference. It was about a middle-aged heir to the throne having the horniest phone conversation in recorded royal history.

Ready for the rehabilitation era?

Operation PB: The Greatest PR Comeback Ever

After Diana's death in 1997, Camilla's public favorability sat at a crushing 13%. The woman was basically royal enemy number one. Enter "Operation Ritz"—a PR masterstroke that would make Olivia Pope weep with joy.

January 28, 1999: Charles and Camilla's first official public appearance at the Ritz Hotel. Mark Bolland, Charles's spin doctor, tipped off 200 photographers for a perfectly choreographed exit. The photos went global with headlines like "At Last."

The numbers tell the story:

• 1997: 86% said she should never be Queen
• 1999: 65% approved of their relationship continuing
• 2022: 55% supported her becoming Queen Consort
• 2025: 37% favorable (only 30% unfavorable)

That's a 24-point favorability swing achieved through years of unglamorous charity work, strategic Daily Mail cultivation, and the Queen's eventual blessing.

About those stepsons though...

How William and Harry Really Felt

Prince Harry's memoir Spare spilled the tea we'd been waiting decades for. Both princes allegedly "begged" Charles not to marry Camilla—not because of her age, but because of everything else. Harry compared meeting her to getting an injection: "Close your eyes and you won't even feel it."

The real sting? Harry claims negative stories about him were strategically leaked to improve Charles and Camilla's image. He called it being "sacrificed on her personal PR altar."

Yet publicly, the princes played nice. Harry told reporters in 2005 they "loved her to bits." The gap between public performance and private pain shows just how irrelevant that 16-month age difference was compared to the emotional wreckage.

So what's the actual lesson here?

Age Gaps That Actually Matter (Spoiler: Not This One)

The archival report includes a comparison table that puts everything in perspective. While Charles and Camilla navigated decades of scandal over 16 months, here's what Hollywood's doing:

• Dennis Quaid & Laura Savoie: 39 years (married, thriving)
• Sam & Aaron Taylor-Johnson: 23 years (she's older, nobody cares)
• Sarah Paulson & Holland Taylor: 32 years (beloved couple goals)

The data shows age gaps only matter when there's nothing else to talk about. Charles and Camilla had tampons, dead ex-wives, and centuries of protocol—their birthdays were literally the least interesting thing about them.

Final receipts from the Age-Gap Files: Their story was never about age. It was about two people from the same tiny social circle, born 16 months apart, who somehow created the biggest royal scandal since the abdication. The fact that she's older just adds a delicious twist to a story that already had everything.

The Ultimate Plot Twist

Queen Elizabeth II ended the whole saga on February 5, 2022, with eight words: "Camilla will be known as Queen Consort." The woman who'd been called "that wicked woman" by the same Queen was suddenly blessed from the highest level.

Charles finally got to marry his age-appropriate girlfriend at 56 (she was 57). They'd known each other for 34 years. The age gap that never mattered still doesn't matter. What matters is they outlasted every scandal, every cruel nickname, every public opinion poll.

The real question: After everything they went through, does anyone seriously think 485 days made any difference?

Curious about your own age compatibility? Try our Age Difference Calculator for instant insights.

FAQ